Skip to main content

Explain Network File System V 4 (NFSv4).

56.Explain Network File System V 4 (NFSv4).
Ans.
1. NFS version 4, offers better security and performance enhancement over previous versions of NFS protocols.

2. NFSv4 incorporates RPCSEC-GSS security, which makes it possible to encrypt the data stream transmitted between NFS client and server.

3. To increase performance, NFSv4 makes complete use of client-side caching to reduce the frequency with which clients must communicate with an NFS server. It increases overall performance by minimizing the number of server round tips.

4. NFSv4 extends its support to ACL (Access control list).

5. Although it is interoperable with NFSv3 but its clients cannot 
mount NFSv2 Exports.

6. NFSv4 enhances performance over internet even on low bandwidth network connections.

7. NFSv4 also supports UTF-8 filenames making cross-platform and inter-character set file sharing more comfortable.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Java,ES,QT practical files

All practical files: Click below to start download Uploaded on special request||||

How to configure Network file system version 4 (NFSv4) client?

69.How to configure Network file system version 4 (NFSv4) client? Ans. 1. There are two new options listed in NFSv4 are introduced as: clientaddr and ports 2. The version 3 of NFS introduced NFS over TCP, which improved NFS’s reliability. 3. In NFSv3, users use the mount option i.e., tcp as client whether client wants to use TCP or UDP to communicate with the server. NFSv4 replaces tcp or udp with a single option i.e. ports=tcp or udp 4. The default buffer size for NFSv4 is 8192 bytes, but it can grow to as large and by 32,678 bytes, which results performance improvements. 5. Following are the mount options: clientaddr=n – Declares client to be multihomed proto=type – Declares port as either udp or tcp resize=n – declares read size of clients buffer wsize=n – Declares write size of clients buffer sec=mod – Declares security model as either krb, krb5 etc.

Absolute Links vs. Relative Links – SEO Value

Absolute Links vs. Relative Links – SEO Value The debate between  absolute links and relative links  continues to live on in the SEO world. The individual significance of each has been contested, but it is widely regarded that absolute links provide better SEO value on the whole than relative links. Many believe that absolute links have less potential for getting messed up when search engines index your page. It shouldn’t really make a difference, but many conclude that this is reason enough. Read more...